Ability to throttle bandwidth and connection.Wait no more, make BulletProof FTP Server yours right now. It can run well on not-so-powerful machines making it even useful and practical for daily use. It has so many features that help you manage your file transfer needs and work.
You can try BulletProof FTP Server for free and purchase for an affordable price.
It is available for Windows and is compatible with most versions. BulletProof FTP Server is a powerful and versatile FTP, FTPS, and SFTP server. Many applications serve the mentioned purpose however, none of them are built natively to be efficient for Windows. "Started all chunks downloads, waiting for them to complete.If you’re looking for a great tool to manage file transfers on your computers and network, look no more. Long size = sizeRequest.GetResponse().ContentLength Ĭonsole.WriteLine($"File has ") NetworkCredential credentials = new NetworkCredential("username", "password") įtpWebRequest sizeRequest = (FtpWebRequest)WebRequest.Create(url)
To workaround that you have to abort the download, once you receive the desired amount of bytes. You can use FtpWebRequest.ContentOffset to specify the starting offset.īut FtpWebRequest.ContentLength is not implemented. You basically use it similar to substring - each connection/sub-request takes X bytes from Y offset. Consider all but point 1 of the Speed Rant.Īsuming FTPWebRequest is still the class you are using, it looks like ContentLenght and ContentOffset might be the droids you are looking for. Some servers do apply a "per connection" limit, and thus splitting the download into multiple segments with their own connection can be a net speedup by.īut be certain this is actually the case here. That being said with Netowrking it sometimes can help. And indeed might cause a slowdown, as NCQ and similar features have to straightern out your random access requests. Multitasking will not add any speedup to Disk or Network bound operations. Generaly file operations are Disk or Network bound. But Massive parallelisation is only in very specific circumtances. One alternate Task for a long running operation is genereally mandatory. If you apply it to the wrong problem, you end up with code that is more complex/prone to errors, more memory demanding and actually slower then the plain old singletasked/sequential approach. Multitasking is not a magical "go faster" bullet.
0 kommentar(er)
